It took me a while to get through it, and some nodding off on the bus, but I felt virtuous at the end Here is the big picture of what he thinks necessary and the work he is trying to do: What is obsolete, however, are traditional or parochial ways of analyzing the matter of race. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, at the dawn of a new millennium, there is a pressing need for a new global approach to race that takes This is such a good book, while at the same time strangely soporific. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, at the dawn of a new millennium, there is a pressing need for a new global approach to race that takes into account the new, "cleaned-up" racial ideologies or post-racial perspectives I have mentioned.
|Published (Last):||20 October 2006|
|PDF File Size:||8.81 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It took me a while to get through it, and some nodding off on the bus, but I felt virtuous at the end Here is the big picture of what he thinks necessary and the work he is trying to do: What is obsolete, however, are traditional or parochial ways of analyzing the matter of race.
At the beginning of the twenty-first century, at the dawn of a new millennium, there is a pressing need for a new global approach to race that takes This is such a good book, while at the same time strangely soporific. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, at the dawn of a new millennium, there is a pressing need for a new global approach to race that takes into account the new, "cleaned-up" racial ideologies or post-racial perspectives I have mentioned.
Adequately to understand the importance of race--historical and contemporary--requires us to reconsider many of our ideas and assumptions about modernity, development, labor, democracy, identity, culture, and indeed, our concepts of social action and agency.
Taken as a whole, these are the coordinates of all social theory. We need a new, racially more adequate, theoretical compass if we want to navigate properly in the twenty-first-century world. A tall order, a clearly beyond the scope of one book, though this attempts much of it. But his main focus is on the World War II break noted by so many: My thesis is that the upsurge of anti-racist activity since World War II constitutes a fundamental and historical shift, a global rupture or "break," in the continuity of worldwide white supremacy.
Throughout this book I use the term break to refer to the mid-century challenge to the continuity of world racial rule over the longue duree of the modern epoch. The origins and contours of that shift are at the center of this work. But still, he takes the long way round to get to this point. This argument hinges on the presence of racial dynamics, key processes of racial formation, in all the main constitutive relationships that structured the origins and development of the modern world system.
These crucial relationships involved the making of new forms of empire and nation; the organization of new systems of capital and labor, and the articulation of new concepts of culture and identity. Because these are circular and cumulative processes, they must be understood as thoroughly intertwined; there is no need or possibility of proposing one of these three as primary or causative.
The link between meaning and structure, discourse and institution, signification and organization, is concretized in the notion of the racial project.
To interpret the meaning of race in a particular way at a given time is at least implicitly, but more often explicitly, to propose or defend a certain racial policy, a specific racialized social structure, a racial order. By studying the range of racial projects in given historical contexts it becomes possible to study given racial formation processes in detail, giving particular attention to the ways in which projects intersect Omi and Winant , The key thing is to understand how racism is foundational to our society, and how it continues to shape everything even in a world where some can even argue that racism no longer exists.
In short, we are witnessing the dawn of a new form of racial hegemony. In the twenty-first century, race will no longer be invoked to legitimate crucial social structures of inequality, exploitation, and injustice. Appeals to white superiority will not serve, as they did in the bad old days. Law, political and human rights, as well as concepts of equality, fairness, and human difference will therefore increasingly be framed in "race-neutral" terms. Yet the race-concept will continue to work at the interface of identity and inequality, social structure and cultural signification.
The rearticulation of in equality in an ostensibly color-blind framework emphasizing individualism and meritocracy, it turns out, preserves the legacy of racial hierarchy far more effectively than its explicit defense Crenshaw et al.
But getting back to history, I love the way he sees the struggle over slavery and racial domination not simply in terms of black freedom, which in itself is a key thing, but also the struggle itself as being fundamental.
Thus, incomplete and uneven as it was, the assault on slavery launched modern politics. Beginning with abolitionism, the dominated and excluded of the world embarked on a long journey. They began the continuing effort to put an  end to empire and colonialism, to extend political and human rights to the ends of the earth.
Abolitionism was the social moyement that first included racially identified subjects-the colonized, the formerly enslaved, the subaltern-on the terrain of the political. Not the fulfillment of abolitionist goals, but the launching and spread of the movement, marked the beginning of the socialization of the political, of the extension of political rights toward the universal.
So the global racial formation process had global political consequences. Not only did race shape the modern world in a great many ways: as a fundamental dimension of capitalist development, as a key factor in imperial expansion and conquest, as a corporealizing means of human identification and classification that informed everyday life and culture. But it also established the overall contours, as well as the particular political and cultural legacies, of subordination and resistance.
Racial rule meant the restriction or even the foreclosure of the political terrain upon which colonized and enslaved people, subaltern groups, could mobilize within civil society. It thus constituted these groups as outside what civil society there was. Racial rule denied the emergence of commonalities among colonizers and colonized, Europeans and non-Europeans, whites and "others.
The movement was repeatedly forced to choose between radicalism and moderation: the former was a constant temptation, imposed by the embeddedness of race in the social and psychic structures of U.
The latter was a political necessity, a pragmatic imperative in the real situation where let it be remembered whites vastly outnumbered blacks. Furthermore, reliance upon and support for racial hierarchy and privilege was largely unconstrained: racially defined minorities had little effective leverage over white racial attitudes and practices.
It is a key issue for struggle though, always, how you mix the ideal and the pragmatic to maximum effect. But he writes The emergence of the civil rights movement in the post-World War II years revitalized the democratic agenda at the height of the Cold War and after the blight of McCarthyism.
Yet the movement, for all its promise, was itself deeply divided: between moderates and radicals, and over the dynamics of racism itself. Although it accomplished the goals of the moderates, the movement failed to confront the embeddedness of race in the social and psychic structures of American life.
Both moderates and radicals played a role in this failure. Moderates accepted the limited concession of integrationist reforms and an adequate institutional response to movement demands.
Radicals rejected these concessions, but gave their faith to revolutionary programs-- both nationalist and socialist--that were inappropriate to the U.
These combined with riots or "uprisings" -- spontaneous outbursts of mass anger, looting, and disruption-- to fuel state racial policies of repression. Racism has been largely -- although not entirely, to be sure--detached from its perpetrators.
In its most advanced forms, indeed, it has no perpetrators; it is a nearly invisible, taken-for-granted, commonsense Gramsci feature of everyday life and global structure. It leaves enough room to contain the old, instrumental, forms of racism--such as prejudice and discrimination, racial code words, and the like--but focuses attention on new, structural forms that can operate more or less automatically.
It incorporates the analyses that critiqued the European new racism Barker ; Taguieff ; Miles ; Wieviorka ; Ansell ; Gilroy , but seeks to place that important work in a global framework. All in all I found this a most valuable book, full of things that I will be thinking about and playing with in relation to research and other critical race theory. They definitely made of this book a giant, though important to the argument that racial formation has been a global process with certain global characteristics alongside immense local variation.
It is definitely an important challenge to think more globally, and how this can most effectively happen.
The world is a ghetto : race and democracy since World War II
Time remaining — day s — hour s — minute s — second s. The World is a Ghetto: How to Kill a City serves as a counterweight to hopelessness about the future of urban America that enables readers to see cities are shaped by powerful interests, and that if we identify those interests, we can begin to control them. We must work with individuals, families and communities to grow the core capabilities we all need to flourish. In this approach, the key element in racial formation is the link between signification and structure, between what race means in a particular discursive practice and how, based upon such interpretations, social structures are racially organized. There is a strong trend through the book for Winant to tell the reader what he is going to do, do it, then tell the reader what he did.